Paper detail

Population Pharmacokinetic Study of Tacrolimus in Pediatric Patients with Primary Nephrotic Syndrome: A Comparison of Linear and Nonlinear Michaelis Menten Pharmacokinetic Model

Background Little is known about the population pharmacokinetics (PPK) of tacrolimus (TAC) in pediatric primary nephrotic syndrome (PNS). This study aimed to compare the predictive performance between nonlinear and linear PK models and investigate the significant factors of TAC PK characteristics in pediatric PNS. Methods Data were obtained from 71 pediatric patients with PNS, along with 525 TAC trough concentrations at steady state. The demographic, medical, and treatment details were collected. Genetic polymorphisms were analyzed. The PPK models were developed using nonlinear mixed effects model software. Two modeling strategies, linear compartmental and nonlinear Michaelis Menten (MM) models, were evaluated and compared. Results Body weight, age, daily dose of TAC, co-therapy drugs (including azole antifungal agents and diltiazem), and CYP3A5*3 genotype were important factors in the final linear model (onecompartment model), whereas only body weight, codrugs, and CYP3A5*3 genotype were the important factors in the nonlinear MM model. Apparent clearance and volume of distribution in the final linear model were 7.13 L/h and 142 L, respectively. The maximal dose rate (Vmax) of the nonlinear MM model was 1.92 mg/day and the average concentration at steady state at half-Vmax (Km) was 1.98 ng/mL. The nonlinear model described the data better than the linear model. Dosing regimens were proposed based on the nonlinear PK model.Conclusion Our findings demonstrate that the nonlinear MM model showed better predictive performance than the linear compartmental model, providing reliable support for optimizing TAC dosing and adjustment in children with PNS.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.