Paper detail

Population inference of spin-induced quadrupole moments as a probe for non-black hole compact binaries

Gravitational-wave (GW) measurements of physical effects such as spin-induced quadrupole moments can distinguish binaries consisting of black holes from non-black hole binaries. While these effects may be poorly constrained for single-event inferences with the second-generation detectors, combining information from multiple detections can help uncover features of non-black hole binaries. The spin-induced quadrupole moment has specific predictions for different types of compact objects, and a generalized formalism must consider a population where different types of compact objects co-exist. In this study, we introduce a hierarchical mixture-likelihood formalism to estimate the {\it fraction of non-binary black holes in the population}. We demonstrate the applicability of this method using simulated GW signals injected into Gaussian noise following the design sensitivities of the Advanced LIGO Advanced Virgo detectors. We compare the performance of this method with a traditionally-followed hierarchical inference approach. Both the methods are equally effective to hint at inhomogeneous populations, however, we find the mixture-likelihood approach to be more natural for mixture populations comprising compact objects of diverse classes. We also discuss the possible systematics in the mixture-likelihood approach, caused by several reasons, including the limited sensitivity of the second-generation detectors, specific features of the astrophysical population distributions, and the limitations posed by the waveform models employed. Finally, we apply this method to the LIGO-Virgo detections published in the second GW transient catalog (GWTC-2) and find them consistent with a binary black hole population within the statistical precision.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.