Paper detail

Popularity on the Roommate Diversity Problem

A recently introduced restricted variant of the multidimensional stable roommate problem is the roommate diversity problem: each agent belongs to one of two types (e.g., red and blue), and the agents' preferences over the coalitions solely depend on the fraction of agents of their own type among their roommates. There are various notions of stability that defines an optimal partitioning of agents. The notion of popularity has received a lot of attention recently. A partitioning of agents is popular if there does not exist another partitioning in which more agents are better off than worse off. Computing a popular partition in a stable roommate game can be done in polynomial time. When we allow ties the stable roommate problem becomes NP-complete. Determining the existence of a popular solution in the multidimensional stable roommate problem also NP-hard. We show that in the roommate diversity problem with the room size fixed to two, the problem becomes tractable. Particularly, a popular partitioning of agents is guaranteed to exist and can be computed in polynomial time. Additionally a mixed popular partitioning of agents is always guaranteed to exist in any roommate diversity game. By contrast, when there are no restrictions on the coalition size of a roommate diversity game, a popular partitioning may fail to exist and the problem becomes intractable. Our results intractability results are summarized as follows: * Determining the existence of a popular partitioning is co-NP-hard, even if the agents' preferences are trichotomous. * Determining the existence of a strictly popular partitioning is co-NP-hard, even if the agents' preferences are dichotomous. * Computing a mixed popular partitioning of agents in polynomial time is impossible unless P=NP, even if the agents' preferences are dichotomous.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.