Paper detail

Pomeron pole plus grey disk model: real parts, inelastic cross sections and LHC data

I propose a two component analytic formula $F(s,t)=F^{(1)}(s,t)+F^{(2)}(s,t)$ for $(ab\rightarrow ab) +(a\bar{b}\rightarrow a\bar{b})$ scattering at energies $\ge 100 GeV$ ,where $s,t$ denote squares of c.m. energy and momentum transfer.It saturates the Froissart-Martin bound and obeys Auberson-Kinoshita-Martin (AKM) \cite{AKM1971} scaling. I choose $Im F^{(1)}(s,0)+Im F^{(2)}(s,0)$ as given by Particle Data Group (PDG) fits to total cross sections. The PDG formula is extended to non-zero momentum transfers using partial waves of $Im F^{(1)}$ and $Im F^{(2)}$ motivated by Pomeron pole and 'grey disk' amplitudes . $Re F(s,t)$ is deduced from real analyticity: I prove that $Re F(s,t)/ImF(s,0) \rightarrow (π/\ln{s}) d/dτ(τIm F(s,t)/ImF(s,0) )$ for $s\rightarrow \infty$ with $τ=t (ln s)^2$ fixed, and apply it to $F^{(2)}$.Using also the forward slope fit by Schegelsky-Ryskin , the model gives real parts,differential cross sections for $(-t)<.3 GeV^2$, and inelastic cross sections in good agreement with data at $546 GeV, 1.8 TeV,7 TeV$ and $ 8 TeV $. It predicts for inelastic cross sections for $pp$ or $\bar{p} p$, $σ_{inel}=72.7\pm 1.0 mb$ at $7TeV$ and $74.2 \pm 1.0mb$ at $8 TeV$ in agreement with $pp$ Totem experimental values $73.1\pm 1.3 mb $ and $74.7\pm 1.7 mb$ respectively, and with Atlas values $71.3\pm 0.9 mb$ and $71.7\pm 0.7mb$ respectively. The predictions at $546 GeV$ and $1800 GeV$ also agree with $\bar{p} p$ experimental results of Abe et al \cite{Abe} at $546 GeV$ and $1800 GeV$. The model yields for $\sqrt{s}> 0.5 TeV$, with PDG2013 total cross sections , and Schegelsky-Ryskin slopes as input, $σ_{inel} (s) =22.6 + .034 ln s + .158 (ln s)^2 mb , and σ_{inel} / σ_{tot} \rightarrow 0.56, s\rightarrow \infty ,$ where $s$ is in $GeV^2$

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.