Paper detail

Polytopes, graphs and fitness landscapes

Darwinian evolution can be illustrated as an uphill walk in a landscape, where the surface consists of genotypes, the height coordinates represent fitness, and each step corresponds to a point mutation. Epistasis, roughly defined as the dependence between the fitness effects of mutations, is a key concept in the theory of adaptation. Important recent approaches depend on graphs and polytopes. Fitness graphs are useful for describing coarse properties of a landscape, such as mutational trajectories and the number of peaks. The graphs have been used for relating global and local properties of fitness landscapes. The geometric theory of gene interaction, or the shape theory, is the most fine-scaled approach to epistasis. Shapes, defined as triangulations of polytopes for any number of loci, replace the well established concepts of positive and negative epistasis for two mutations. From the shape one can identify the fittest populations, i.e., populations where allele shuffling (recombination) will not increase the mean fitness. Shapes and graphs provide complementary information. The approaches make no structural assumptions about the underlying fitness landscapes, which make them well suited for empirical work.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.