Paper detail

Polynomial Kernels for λ-extendible Properties Parameterized Above the Poljak-Turzík Bound

Poljak and Turzik (Discrete Mathematics 1986) introduced the notion of λ-extendible properties of graphs as a generalization of the property of being bipartite. They showed that for any 0 < λ < 1 and λ-extendible property Π, any connected graph G on n vertices and m edges contains a spanning subgraph H in Π with at least λm + (1-λ)(n-1)/2 edges. The property of being bipartite is λ-extendible for λ = 1/2, and so the Poljak-Turzik bound generalizes the well-known Edwards-Erdos bound for Max-Cut. Other examples of λ-extendible properties include: being an acyclic oriented graph, a balanced signed graph, or a q-colorable graph for some integer q. Mnich et. al. (FSTTCS 2012) defined the closely related notion of strong λ-extendibility. They showed that the problem of finding a subgraph satisfying a given strongly λ-extendible property Π is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) when parameterized above the Poljak-Turzik bound - does there exist a spanning subgraph H of a connected graph G such that H in Π and H has at least λm + (1-λ)(n-1)/2 + k edges? - subject to the condition that the problem is FPT on a certain simple class of graphs called almost-forests of cliques. In this paper we settle the kernelization complexity of nearly all problems parameterized above Poljak-Turzik bounds, in the affirmative. We show that these problems admit quadratic kernels (cubic when λ = 1/2), without using the assumption that the problem is FPT on almost-forests of cliques. Thus our results not only remove the technical condition of being FPT on almost-forests of cliques from previous results, but also unify and extend previously known kernelization results in this direction. Our results add to the select list of generic kernelization results known in the literature.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.