Paper detail

Polynomial Bounds for the Grid-Minor Theorem

One of the key results in Robertson and Seymour's seminal work on graph minors is the Grid-Minor Theorem (also called the Excluded Grid Theorem). The theorem states that for every grid $H$, every graph whose treewidth is large enough relative to $|V(H)|$ contains $H$ as a minor. This theorem has found many applications in graph theory and algorithms. Let $f(k)$ denote the largest value such that every graph of treewidth $k$ contains a grid minor of size $(f(k)\times f(k))$. The best previous quantitative bound, due to recent work of Kawarabayashi and Kobayashi, and Leaf and Seymour, shows that $f(k)=Ω(\sqrt{\log k/\log \log k})$. In contrast, the best known upper bound implies that $f(k) = O(\sqrt{k/\log k})$. In this paper we obtain the first polynomial relationship between treewidth and grid minor size by showing that $f(k)=Ω(k^δ)$ for some fixed constant $δ> 0$, and describe a randomized algorithm, whose running time is polynomial in $|V(G)|$ and $k$, that with high probability finds a model of such a grid minor in $G$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.