Paper detail

Polymorphic Encryption and Pseudonymisation of IP Network Flows

We describe a system, PEP3, for storage and retrieval of IP flow information in which the IP addresses are replaced by pseudonyms. Every eligible party gets its own set of pseudonyms. A single entity, the transcryptor, that is composed of five independent peers, is responsible for the generation of, depseudonymisation of, and translation between different sets of pseudonyms. These operations can be performed by any three of the five peers, preventing a single point of trust or failure. Using homomorphic aspects of ElGamal encryption the peers perform their operations on encrypted and --potentially-- pseudonymised IP addresses only, thereby never learning the (pseudonymised) IP addresses handled by the parties. Moreover, using Schnorr type proofs, the behaviour of the peers can be verified, without revealing the (pseudonymised) IP addresses either. Hence the peers are central, but need not be fully trusted. The design of our system, while easily modified to other settings, is tuned to the sheer volume of data presented by IP flow information.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.