Paper detail

Polyhedral duality in Bell scenarios with two binary observables

For the Bell scenario with two parties and two binary observables per party, it is known that the no-signaling polytope is the polyhedral dual (polar) of the Bell polytope. Computational evidence suggests that this duality also holds for three parties. Using ideas of Werner, Wolf, Żukowski and Brukner, we prove this for any number of parties by describing a simple linear bijection mapping (tight) Bell inequalities to (extremal) no-signaling boxes and vice versa. Furthermore, a symmetry-based technique for extending Bell inequalities (resp. no-signaling boxes) with two binary observables from n parties to n+1 parties is described; the Mermin-Klyshko family of Bell inequalities arises in this way, as well as 11 of the 46 classes of tight Bell inequalities for 3 parties. Finally, we ask whether the set of quantum correlations is self-dual with respect to our transformation. We find this not to be the case in general, although it holds for 2 parties on the level of correlations. This self-duality implies Tsirelson's bound for the CHSH inequality.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.