Paper detail

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon and Emission Line Ratios in Active Galactic Nuclei and Starburst Galaxies

We study the Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) bands, ionic emission lines, and Mid-infrared continuum properties, in a sample of 171 emission line galaxies taken from literature plus 15 new active galactic nuclei (AGN) Spitzer spectra. The continuum shape steeply rises for longer wavelengths and can be fitted with a warm blackbody distribution of T=150-300K. The brightest PAH spectral bands (6.2, 7.7, 8.6, 11.3, and 12.7$μ$m) and the forbidden emission lines of [Si II] 34.8$μ$m, [Ar II] 6.9, [S III] 18.7 and 33.4 were detected in all the Starbursts and in ~80% of the Seyfert~2. Taking under consideration only the PAH bands at 7.7$μ$m, 11.3$μ$m, and 12.7$μ$m we find they are present in ~80% of the Seyfert 1, while only half of this type of activity show the 6.2$μ$m and 8.6 PAH bands. The observed intensities ratios for neutral and ionized PAHs (6.2/7.7 x 11.3/7.7) were compared to theoretical intensity ratios, showing that AGNs have higher ionization fraction and larger PAH (> 180 carbon atoms) than SB galaxies. The ratio between the ionized (7.7) and the neutral PAH bands (8.6 and 11.3) are distributed over different ranges for AGNs and SB galaxies, suggesting that these ratios could depend on the ionization fraction, as well as on the hardness of the radiation field. The ratio between the 7.7 and 11.3 bands is nearly constant with the increase of [Ne III]15.5/[Ne II], indicating that the fraction of ionized to neutral PAH bands does not depend on the hardness of the radiation field. The equivalent width of both PAH features show the same dependence with [Ne III]/[Ne II], suggesting that the PAH, emitting either ionized (7.7) or neutral (11.3) bands, may be destroyed with the increase of the hardness of the radiation field.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.