Paper detail

Policy Gradient-based Algorithms for Continuous-time Linear Quadratic Control

We consider the continuous-time Linear-Quadratic-Regulator (LQR) problem in terms of optimizing a real-valued matrix function over the set of feedback gains. The results developed are in parallel to those in Bu et al. [1] for discrete-time LTI systems. In this direction, we characterize several analytical properties (smoothness, coerciveness, quadratic growth) that are crucial in the analysis of gradient-based algorithms. We also point out similarities and distinctive features of the continuous time setup in comparison with its discrete time analogue. First, we examine three types of well-posed flows direct policy update for LQR: gradient flow, natural gradient flow and the quasi-Newton flow. The coercive property of the corresponding cost function suggests that these flows admit unique solutions while the gradient dominated property indicates that the underling Lyapunov functionals decay at an exponential rate; quadratic growth on the other hand guarantees that the trajectories of these flows are exponentially stable in the sense of Lyapunov. We then discuss the forward Euler discretization of these flows, realized as gradient descent, natural gradient descent and quasi-Newton iteration. We present stepsize criteria for gradient descent and natural gradient descent, guaranteeing that both algorithms converge linearly to the global optima. An optimal stepsize for the quasi-Newton iteration is also proposed, guaranteeing a $Q$-quadratic convergence rate--and in the meantime--recovering the Kleinman-Newton iteration. Lastly, we examine LQR state feedback synthesis with a sparsity pattern. In this case, we develop the necessary formalism and insights for projected gradient descent, allowing us to guarantee a sublinear rate of convergence to a first-order stationary point.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.