Paper detail

Polarization correction towards satellite-based QKD without an active feedback

Quantum key distribution (QKD) is a cryptographic protocol to enable two parties to share a secure key string, which can be used in one-time pad cryptosystem. There has been an ongoing surge of interest in implementing long-haul photonic-implementation of QKD protocols. However, the endeavour is challenging in many aspects. In particular, one of the major challenges is the polarization degree of freedom of single-photons getting affected while transmission through optical fibres, or atmospheric turbulence. Conventionally, an active feedback-based mechanism is employed to achieve real-time polarization tracking. In this work, we propose an alternative approach where we first perform a state tomography to reconstruct the output density matrix. We then evaluate the optimal measurement bases at Bob's end that leads to the maximum (anti-)correlation in the measurement outcomes of both parties. As a proof-of-principle demonstration, we implement an in-lab BBM92 protocol -- a particular variant of a QKD protocol using quantum entanglement as a resource -- to exemplify the performance of our technique. We experimentally generate polarization-entangled photon pairs having $94\%$ fidelity with $\ketψ_1 = 1/\sqrt{2}\,(\ket{HV}+\ket{VH})$ state and a concurrence of $0.92$. By considering a representative 1 ns coincidence window span, we are able to achieve a quantum-bit-error-rate (QBER) of $\approx 5\%$, and a key rate of $\approx 35$ Kbps. The protocol performance is independent of local polarization rotations through optical fibres. We also develop an algorithmic approach to optimize the trade-off between the key rate and QBER. Our approach obviates the need for active polarization tracking. Our method is also applicable to entanglement-based QKD demonstrations using partially mixed as well as non-maximally entangled states, and extends to single-photon implementations over fibre channels.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.