Paper detail

Polarization behavior of periodic optical outbursts in blazar OJ287

As a characteristic feature of generic blazars the polarization behavior of the quasi-periodic optical outbursts observed in OJ287 is investigated. The optical light-curves of the December/2015 outburst are also simulated in terms of the precessing jet nozzle model previously proposed. The polarization behavior of three primary quasi-periodic optical outbursts peaking in 1983.0, 2007.8 and 2015.8 are analyzed in order to understand the nature of their optical radiation. A two-component model has been applied,showing that the variations in flux density, polarization degree and polarization position angle can be consistently interpreted with two polarized components: one steady-component with constant polarization and one burst-component with varying polarization (e.g., relativistic shock propagating along the jet-beam axis). The flux light curves of the December/2015 outburst (including its first flare and second flare) are well model-simulated in terms of 14 elementary synchrotron sub-flares, each having a symmetric profile. The model simulations of polarization behavior for the three major outbursts (in 1983.0, 2007.8 and 2015.8) demonstrate that they all exhibit rapid and large rotations in polarization position angle, implying that they are synchrotron flares produced in the jet. Combining with the results previously obtained for interpreting the optical light curves in terms of lighthouse effect for both quasi-periodic and non-periodic outbursts, we suggest that relativistic jet models may be the most appropriate models for understanding the nature of the optical flaring radiation in blazar OJ287: its optical outbursts may comprise a number of blended "elementary synchrotron flares" , each produced by the helical motion of individual superluminal optical knots via lighhouse effect.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.