Paper detail

Polar stellar-spots and grazing planetary transits: possible explanation for the low number of discovered grazing planets

We assess a physically feasible explanation for the low number of discovered (near-)grazing planetary transits through all ground and space based transit surveys. We performed simulations to generate the synthetic distribution of detectable planets based on their impact parameter, and found that a larger number of (near-)grazing planets should have been detected than have been detected. Our explanation for the insufficient number of (near-)grazing planets is based on a simple assumption that a large number of (near-)grazing planets transit host stars which harbor dark giant polar spot, and thus the transit light-curve vanishes due to the occultation of grazing planet and the polar spot. We conclude by evaluating the properties required of polar spots in order to make disappear the grazing transit light-curve, and we conclude that their properties are compatible with the expected properties from observations.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.