Paper detail

Point defects stabilise cubic Mo-N and Ta-N

We employ \textit{ab initio} calculations to investigate energetics of point defects in metastable rocksalt cubic Ta-N and Mo-N. Our results reveal a strong tendency to off-stoichiometry, i.e. defected structures are predicted to be more stable than perfect ones with 1:1 metal-to-nitrogen stoichiometry, in agreement with previous literature reports. While Ta-N significantly favours metal vacancies, Mo-N exhibits similar energies of formation regardless of the vacancy type ($V_\text{Mo}$, $V_\text{N}$) as long as their concentration is below $\approx15\,\text{at.\%}$. The overall lowest energy of formation were obtained for $\text{Ta}_{0.78}\text{N}$ and $\text{Mo}_{0.91}\text{N}$, which are hence predicted to be the most stable compositions. To account for various experimental condition during synthesis, we further evaluated the phase stability as a function of chemical potential of individual species. The proposed phase diagrams reveal four stable compositions, $\text{Mo}_{0.84}\text{N}$, $\text{Mo}_{0.91}\text{N}$, $\text{MoN}_{0.69}$ and $\text{MoN}_{0.44}$, in the case of Mo-N and nine stable compositions in the case of Ta-N indicating the crucial role of metal under-stoichiometry, since $\text{Ta}_{0.75}\text{N}$ and $\text{Ta}_{0.78}\text{N}$ significantly dominate the diagram. These results are important for understanding and designing experiments using non-equilibrium deposition techniques. Finally, we discuss a role of defects ordering and estimate a cubic lattice parameter as a function of a defect contents.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.