Paper detail

Point Defects and Grain Boundaries in Rotationally Commensurate MoS2 on Epitaxial Graphene

With reduced degrees of freedom, structural defects are expected to play a greater role in two-dimensional materials in comparison to their bulk counterparts. In particular, mechanical strength, electronic properties, and chemical reactivity are strongly affected by crystal imperfections in the atomically thin limit. Here, ultra-high vacuum (UHV) scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) and spectroscopy (STS) are employed to interrogate point and line defects in monolayer MoS2 grown on epitaxial graphene (EG) at the atomic scale. Five types of point defects are observed with the majority species showing apparent structures that are consistent with vacancy and interstitial models. The total defect density is observed to be lower than MoS2 grown on other substrates, and is likely attributed to the van der Waals epitaxy of MoS2 on EG. Grain boundaries (GBs) with 30° and 60° tilt angles resulting from the rotational commensurability of MoS2 on EG are more easily resolved by STM than atomic force microscopy at similar scales due to the enhanced contrast from their distinct electronic states. For example, band gap reduction to ~0.8 eV and ~0.5 eV is observed with STS for 30° and 60° GBs, respectively. In addition, atomic resolution STM images of these GBs are found to agree well with proposed structure models. This work offers quantitative insight into the structure and properties of common defects in MoS2, and suggests pathways for tailoring the performance of MoS2/graphene heterostructures via defect engineering.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.