Paper detail

Plateau Moduli of Several Single-Chain Slip-Link and Slip-Spring Models

We calculate the plateau moduli of several single-chain slip-link and slip-spring models for entangled polymers. In these models, the entanglement effects are phenomenologically modeled by introducing topological constraints such as slip-links and slip-springs. The average number of segments between two neighboring slip-links or slip-springs, $N_{0}$, is an input parameter in these models. To analyze experimental data, the characteristic number of segments in entangled polymers $N_{e}$ estimated from the plateau modulus is used instead. Both $N_{0}$ and $N_{e}$ characterize the topological constraints in entangled polymers, and naively $N_{0}$ is considered to be the same as $N_{e}$. However, earlier studies showed that $N_{0}$ and $N_{e}$ (or the plateau modulus) should be considered as independent parameters. In this work, we show that due to the fluctuations at the short time scale, $N_{e}$ deviates from $N_{0}$. This means that the relation between $N_{0}$ and the plateau modulus is not simple as naively expected. The plateau modulus (or $N_{e}$) depends on the subchain-scale details of the employed model, as well as the average number of segments $N_{0}$. This is due to the fact that the subchain-scale fluctuation mechanisms depend on the model rather strongly. We theoretically calculate the plateau moduli for several single-chain slip-link and slip-spring models. Our results explicitly show that the relation between $N_{0}$ and $N_{e}$ is model-dependent. We compare theoretical results with various simulation data in the literature, and show that our theoretical expressions reasonably explain the simulation results.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.