Paper detail

Plasticity in irradiated FeCrAl nanopillars investigated using discrete dislocation dynamics

In this paper, we investigate plasticity in irradiated FeCrAl nanopillars using discrete dislocation dynamics simulations (DDD), with comparisons to transmission electron microscopic (TEM) in situ tensile tests of ion and neutron irradiated commercial FeCrAl alloy C35M. The effects of irradiation-induced defects, such as a/2 111 and a 100 type loops and composition fluctuations representative of phase separation in irradiated FeCrAl alloys, are investigated separately as well as superposed together in simulations. We explore the effects of defects on the stress-strain behavior, specifically yield strength and hardening response, of FeCrAl nanopillars. Our simulations confirm the widely accepted fact that irradiated alloys exhibit a stress-strain response with higher yield strength and hardening as compared to homogeneous alloys. However, our DDD calculations reveal an atypical superposition of the hardening contributions due to composition inhomogeneity and irradiation loops wherein hardening due composition inhomogeneity counteracts hardening due to irradiation loops at small scales. As a result, we observe that the yield strength in irradiated alloys, after taking into consideration the effects of both composition inhomogeneity and irradiation loops, is smaller than the yield strength of the alloys with only irradiation loops and is approximately same for the alloy with composition inhomogeneity alone. We identify this destructive interference in the superposition in our parallel TEM in situ tensile tests on unirradiated, ion irradiated, and neutron irradiated C35M FeCrAl alloy as well. This destructive interference in the hardening contributions contrasts with the widely utilized dispersed barrier hardening (DBH) models by the experimental community to model the hardening contributions due to different irradiation induced defects.

preprint2023arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.