Paper detail

Plasma walls beyond the perfect absorber approximation for electrons

Plasma walls accumulate electrons more efficiently than ions leading to wall potentials which are negative with respect to the plasma potential. Theoretically, walls are usually treated as perfect absorber for electrons and ions implying perfect sticking of the particles to the wall and infinitely long desorption times for particles stuck to the wall. For electrons we question the perfect absorber model and calculate, specifically for a planar dielectric wall, the electron sticking coefficient $s_e$ and the electron desorption time $τ_e$. For the uncharged wall we find $s_e\ll 1$ and $τ_e\approx 10^{-4}s$. Thus, in the early stage of the build-up of the wall potential, when the wall is essentially uncharged, the wall is not a perfect absorber for electrons. For the charged wall we find $τ_e^{-1}\approx 0$. Thus, $τ_e$ approaches the perfect absorber value. But $s_e$ is still only of the order of $10^{-1}$. Calculating $s_e$ as a function of the wall potential and combining this expression with the quasi-stationary balance equations for the electron and ion surface densities we find the selfconsistent wall potential, including surface effects, to be 30% of the perfect absorber value.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.