Paper detail

Plaskett 1.8 metre Observations of Starlink Satellites

We present observations of 23 Starlink satellites in the $g'$ bandpass, obtained from the Dominion Astrophysical Observatory's Plaskett 1.8 metre telescope. The targets include a mixture of satellites with and without brightness mitigation measures (i.e., visors). At the time of the observations (16 July 2021), Starlink satellites were sunlight throughout the night, and even with strict elevation and azimuth limits, there were over 800 candidate Starlink arcs. The satellites altogether have a median absolute brightness (550 km) of $\overline{H}_g^{550} =5.3$ mag. Dividing the targets into those without and with visors, their median absolute magnitudes are $\overline{H}_g^{550}(no~visor)=5.1$ and $\overline{H}^{550}_g(visor)=5.7$ mag, respectively. While the visor sample is dimmer in aggregate, the absolute brightness distribution ranged from $H_g^{550}=4.3$ mag to 9.4 mag, with the brightest being a visored satellite and the dimmest a satellite with no mitigation. The intrinsic brightness dispersion among the full sample is $σ_g = 0.5$ mag.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.