Paper detail

Planets: Power Laws and Classification

The study of the interior of the planets requires the knowledge of how certain parameters, as radius and mean density, vary according to the planet mass. The aim of this work is to use known data of the Solar System Planets and Transiting Exoplanets (specifically the radius and mass) to create empirical laws for the planetary radius, mean density, and surface gravity as a function of mass. The method used is to calculate with the available data, the mean density and surface gravity for the planets and adjusts, using the least squares method, a function with respect to the radius-mass, density-mass and surface gravity-mass relations. In the mass interval from 10E19 to 10E29 kg, the planets separate in a natural way into three groups or classes which I called class A, class B and class C. In all these classes and with all the functions (radius, median density and surface gravity) those best fits are power laws.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.