Paper detail

Planetesimal formation around the snow line. II. Dust or pebbles?

Around the snow line, icy pebbles and silicate dust may locally pile-up and form icy and rocky planetesimals via streaming instability and/or gravitational instability. We perform 1D diffusion-advection simulations that include the back-reaction to radial drift and diffusion of icy pebbles and silicate dust, ice sublimation, release of silicate dust, and their recycling through recondensation and sticking onto pebbles outside the snow line. We use a realistic description of the scale height of silicate dust obtained from Ida et al. and that of pebbles including the effects of a Kelvin-Helmholtz instability. We study the dependence of solid pile-up on distinct effective viscous parameters for turbulent diffusions in the radial and vertical directions ($α_{\rm Dr}$ and $α_{\rm Dz}$) and for the gas accretion to the star ($α_{\rm acc}$) as well as that on the pebble-to-gas mass flux ($F_{\rm p/g}$). We derive the sublimation width of drifting icy pebbles which is a critical parameter to characterize the pile-up of silicate dust and pebbles around the snow line. We identify a parameter space (in the $F_{\rm p/g}-α_{\rm acc}-α_{\rm Dz}(=α_{\rm Dr})$ space) where pebbles no longer drift inward to reach the snow line due to the back-reaction that slows down radial velocity of pebbles. We show that the pile-up of solids around the snow line occurs in a broader range of parameters for $α_{\rm acc}=10^{-3}$ than for $α_{\rm acc}=10^{-2}$. Above a critical $F_{\rm p/g}$ value, the runaway pile-up of silicate dust inside the snow line is favored for $α_{\rm Dr}/α_{\rm acc} \ll 1$, while that of pebbles outside the snow line is favored for $α_{\rm Dr}/α_{\rm acc} \sim 1$. Our results imply that a distinct evolutionary path could produce a diversity of outcomes in terms of planetesimal formation around the snow line.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.