Paper detail

Planetary systems with forces other than gravitational forces

A discrete and exact algorithm for obtaining planetary systems is derived in a recent article (Eur. Phys. J. Plus 2022, 137:99). Here the algorithm is used to obtain planetary systems with forces different from the Newtonian inverse square gravitational forces. A Newtonian planetary system exhibits regular elliptical orbits, and here it is demonstrated that a planetary system with pure inverse forces also is stable and with regular orbits, whereas a planetary system with inverse cubic forces is unstable and without regular orbits. The regular orbits in a planetary system with inverse forces deviate, however, from the usual elliptical orbits by having revolving orbits with tendency to orbits with three or eight loops. Newton's Proposition 45 in $\textit{Principia}$ for the Moon's revolving orbits caused by an additional attraction to the gravitational attraction is confirmed, but whereas the additional inverse forces stabilize the planetary system, the additional inverse cubic forces can destabilize the planetary system at a sufficient strength.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.