Paper detail

Planet-Mediated Precision-Reconstruction of the Evolution of the Cataclysmic Variable HU Aquarius

Cataclysmic variables (CVs) are binaries in which a compact white dwarf accretes material from a low-mass companion star. The discovery of two planets in orbit around the CV HU Aquarii opens unusual opportunities for understanding the formation and evolution of this system. In particular the orbital parameters of the planets constrains the past and enables us to reconstruct the evolution of the system through the common-envelope phase. During this dramatic event the entire hydrogen envelope of the primary star is ejected, passing the two planets on the way. The observed eccentricities and orbital separations of the planets in HU Aqr enable us to limit the common-envelope parameter $αλ= 0.45\pm 0.17$ or $γ= 1.77\pm0.02$ and measure the rate at which the common envelope is ejected, which turns out to be copious. The mass in the common envelope is ejected from the binary system at a rate of ${\dot m} = 1.9\pm 0.3\,\MSun/yr$. The reconstruction of the initial conditions for HU Aqr indicates that the primary star had a mass of $M_{\rm ZAMS} = 1.6\pm0.2$\,\MSun\, and a $m_{\rm ZAMS} = 0.47\pm 0.04$\,\MSun\, companion in a $a=25$--160\,\RSun\, (best value $a=97$\,\RSun) binary. The two planets were born with an orbital separation of $a_a=541\pm44$\,\RSun\, and $a_b=750\pm72$\,\Rsun\, respectively. After the common envelope, the primary star turns into a $0.52\pm0.01$\,\MSun\, helium white dwarf, which subsequently accreted $\sim 0.30$\,\MSun\, from its Roche-lobe filling companion star, grinding it down to its current observed mass of $0.18\,\MSun$.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.