Paper detail

Planet formation by pebble accretion in ringed disks

Context: Pebble accretion is expected to be the dominant process for the formation of massive solid planets, such as the cores of giant planets and super-Earths. So, far, this process has been studied under the assumption that dust coagulates and drifts throughout the full protoplanetary disk. However, observations show that many disks are structured in rings that may be due to pressure maxima, preventing the global radial drift of the dust. Aims: We study how the pebble-accretion paradigm changes if the dust is confined in a ring. Results: Planet Type-I migration is stopped in a ring, but not necessarily at its center. If the entropy-driven corotation torque is desaturated, the planet is located in a region with a low density of dust, which severely limits its accretion rate. If instead the planet is near the ring's center, its accretion rate can be similar to the one it would have in a classic (ring-less) disk of equivalent dust density. However, the growth rate of the planet is limited by the diffusion of dust in the ring and the final planet's mass is bounded by the total ring's mass. The DSHARP rings are too far from the star to allow the formation of massive planets within the disk's lifetime. However, a similar ring rescaled to 5 AU could lead to the formation of a planet incorporating the full ring's mass in less than 1/2 My. Conclusions: The existence of rings may not be an obstacle to planet formation by pebble-accretion. However, for accretion to be effective the resting position of the planet has to be relatively near the ring's center and the ring needs to be not too far from the central star. The formation of planets in rings can explain the existence of giant planets with core masses smaller than the so-called pebble isolation mass.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.