Paper detail

Planes of satellites around simulated disc galaxies: I.- Finding high-quality planar configurations from positional information and their comparison to MW/M31 data

We address the 'plane of satellites problem' by studying planar configurations around two disc galaxies with no late major mergers, formed in zoom-in hydro-simulations. Due to the current lack of good quality kinematic data for M31 satellites, we use only positional information. So far, positional analyses of simulations are unable to find planes as thin and populated as the observed ones. Moreover, they miss systematicity and detail in the plane-searching techniques, as well as in the study of the properties and quality of planes, both in simulations or real data. To fill this gap, i) we extend the 4-galaxy-normal density plot method (Pawlowski et al. 2013) in a way designed to efficiently identify the best quality planes (i.e., thin and populated) without imposing extra constraints on their properties, and ii), we apply it for the first time to simulations. Using zoom-in simulations allows us to mimic MW/M31-like systems regarding the number of satellites involved as well as the galactic disc mass and morphology, in view of possible disc effects. At all timesteps analyzed in both simulations we find satellite planar configurations that are compatible, along given time intervals, with all the spatial characteristics of observed planes identified using the same methodology. However, the fraction of co-orbiting satellites within them is in general low, suggesting time-varying satellite membership. We conclude that high-quality positional planes of satellites are not infrequent in LCDM-formed disc galaxies with a quiet assembly history. Detecting kinematically-coherent, time-persistent planes demands considering the full six-dimensional phase-space information of satellites.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.