Paper detail

Planck 2018 results. VII. Isotropy and Statistics of the CMB

Analysis of the Planck 2018 data set indicates that the statistical properties of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature anisotropies are in excellent agreement with previous studies using the 2013 and 2015 data releases. In particular, they are consistent with the Gaussian predictions of the $Λ$CDM cosmological model, yet also confirm the presence of several so-called "anomalies" on large angular scales. The novelty of the current study, however, lies in being a first attempt at a comprehensive analysis of the statistics of the polarization signal over all angular scales, using either maps of the Stokes parameters, $Q$ and $U$, or the $E$-mode signal derived from these using a new methodology (which we describe in an appendix). Although remarkable progress has been made in reducing the systematic effects that contaminated the 2015 polarization maps on large angular scales, it is still the case that residual systematics (and our ability to simulate them) can limit some tests of non-Gaussianity and isotropy. However, a detailed set of null tests applied to the maps indicates that these issues do not dominate the analysis on intermediate and large angular scales (i.e., $\ell \lesssim 400$). In this regime, no unambiguous detections of cosmological non-Gaussianity, or of anomalies corresponding to those seen in temperature, are claimed. Notably, the stacking of CMB polarization signals centred on the positions of temperature hot and cold spots exhibits excellent agreement with the $Λ$CDM cosmological model, and also gives a clear indication of how Planck provides state-of-the-art measurements of CMB temperature and polarization on degree scales.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
Planck CollaborationY. AkramiM. AshdownJ. AumontC. BaccigalupiM. BallardiniA. J. BandayR. B. BarreiroN. BartoloS. BasakK. BenabedM. BersanelliP. BielewiczJ. J. BockJ. R. BondJ. BorrillF. R. BouchetF. BoulangerM. BucherC. BuriganaR. C. ButlerE. CalabreseJ. -F. CardosoB. CasaponsaH. C. ChiangL. P. L. ColomboC. CombetD. ContrerasB. P. CrillP. de BernardisG. De ZottiJ. DelabrouilleJ. -M. DelouisE. Di ValentinoJ. M. DiegoO. DoréM. DouspisA. DucoutX. DupacG. EfstathiouF. ElsnerT. A. EnßlinH. K. EriksenY. FantayeR. Fernandez-CobosF. FinelliM. FrailisA. A. FraisseE. FranceschiA. FrolovS. GaleottaS. GalliK. GangaR. T. Génova-SantosM. GerbinoT. GhoshJ. González-NuevoK. M. GórskiA. GruppusoJ. E. GudmundssonJ. HamannW. HandleyF. K. HansenD. HerranzE. HivonZ. HuangA. H. JaffeW. C. JonesE. KeihänenR. KeskitaloK. KiiveriJ. KimN. KrachmalnicoffM. KunzH. Kurki-SuonioG. LagacheJ. -M. LamarreA. LasenbyM. LattanziC. R. LawrenceM. Le JeuneF. LevrierM. LiguoriP. B. LiljeV. LindholmM. López-CaniegoY. -Z. MaJ. F. Macías-PérezG. MaggioD. MainoN. MandolesiA. MangilliA. Marcos-CaballeroM. MarisP. G. MartinE. Martínez-GonzálezS. MatarreseN. MauriJ. D. McEwenP. R. MeinholdA. MennellaM. MigliaccioM. -A. Miville-DeschênesD. MolinariA. MonetiL. MontierG. MorganteA. MossP. NatoliL. PaganoD. PaolettiB. PartridgeF. PerrottaV. PettorinoF. PiacentiniG. PolentaJ. -L. PugetJ. P. RachenM. ReineckeM. RemazeillesA. RenziG. RochaC. RossetG. RoudierJ. A. Rubiño-MartínB. Ruiz-GranadosL. SalvatiM. SavelainenD. ScottE. P. S. ShellardC. SirignanoR. SunyaevA. -S. Suur-UskiJ. A. TauberD. TavagnaccoM. TentiL. ToffolattiM. TomasiT. TrombettiL. ValenzianoJ. ValiviitaB. Van TentP. VielvaF. VillaN. VittorioB. D. WandeltI. K. WehusA. ZaccheiJ. P. ZibinA. Zonca
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Planck CollaborationY. AkramiM. AshdownJ. AumontC. BaccigalupiM. BallardiniA. J. BandayR. B. BarreiroN. BartoloS. BasakK. BenabedM. BersanelliP. BielewiczJ. J. BockJ. R. BondJ. BorrillF. R. BouchetF. BoulangerM. BucherC. BuriganaR. C. ButlerE. CalabreseJ. -F. CardosoB. CasaponsaH. C. ChiangL. P. L. ColomboC. CombetD. ContrerasB. P. CrillP. de BernardisG. De ZottiJ. DelabrouilleJ. -M. DelouisE. Di ValentinoJ. M. DiegoO. DoréM. DouspisA. DucoutX. DupacG. EfstathiouF. ElsnerT. A. EnßlinH. K. EriksenY. FantayeR. Fernandez-CobosF. FinelliM. FrailisA. A. FraisseE. FranceschiA. FrolovS. GaleottaS. GalliK. GangaR. T. Génova-SantosM. GerbinoT. GhoshJ. González-NuevoK. M. GórskiA. GruppusoJ. E. GudmundssonJ. HamannW. HandleyF. K. HansenD. HerranzE. HivonZ. HuangA. H. JaffeW. C. JonesE. KeihänenR. KeskitaloK. KiiveriJ. KimN. KrachmalnicoffM. KunzH. Kurki-SuonioG. LagacheJ. -M. LamarreA. LasenbyM. LattanziC. R. LawrenceM. Le JeuneF. LevrierM. LiguoriP. B. LiljeV. LindholmM. López-CaniegoY. -Z. MaJ. F. Macías-PérezG. MaggioD. MainoN. MandolesiA. MangilliA. Marcos-CaballeroM. MarisP. G. MartinE. Martínez-GonzálezS. MatarreseN. MauriJ. D. McEwenP. R. MeinholdA. MennellaM. MigliaccioM. -A. Miville-DeschênesD. MolinariA. MonetiL. MontierG. MorganteA. MossP. NatoliL. PaganoD. PaolettiB. PartridgeF. PerrottaV. PettorinoF. PiacentiniG. PolentaJ. -L. PugetJ. P. RachenM. ReineckeM. RemazeillesA. RenziG. RochaC. RossetG. RoudierJ. A. Rubiño-MartínB. Ruiz-GranadosL. SalvatiM. SavelainenD. ScottE. P. S. ShellardC. SirignanoR. SunyaevA. -S. Suur-UskiJ. A. TauberD. TavagnaccoM. TentiL. ToffolattiM. TomasiT. TrombettiL. ValenzianoJ. ValiviitaB. Van TentP. VielvaF. VillaN. VittorioB. D. WandeltI. K. WehusA. ZaccheiJ. P. ZibinA. Zonca

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.