Planck 2015 results. XIX. Constraints on primordial magnetic fields

preprint2016arXivOpen access
Planck CollaborationP. A. R. AdeN. AghanimM. ArnaudF. ArrojaM. AshdownJ. AumontC. BaccigalupiM. BallardiniA. J. BandayR. B. BarreiroN. BartoloE. BattanerK. BenabedA. BenoîtA. Benoit-LévyJ. -P. BernardM. BersanelliP. BielewiczJ. J. BockA. BonaldiL. BonaveraJ. R. BondJ. BorrillF. R. BouchetM. BucherC. BuriganaR. C. ButlerE. CalabreseJ. -F. CardosoA. CatalanoA. ChamballuH. C. ChiangJ. ChlubaP. R. ChristensenS. ChurchD. L. ClementsS. ColombiL. P. L. ColomboC. CombetF. CouchotA. CoulaisB. P. CrillA. CurtoF. CuttaiaL. DaneseR. D. DaviesR. J. DavisP. de BernardisA. De RosaG. De ZottiJ. DelabrouilleF. -X. DésertJ. M. DiegoK. DolagH. DoleS. DonzelliO. DoréM. DouspisA. DucoutX. DupacG. EfstathiouF. ElsnerT. A. EnßlinH. K. EriksenJ. FergussonF. FinelliE. FloridoO. ForniM. FrailisA. A. FraisseE. FranceschiA. FrejselS. GaleottaS. GalliK. GangaM. GiardY. Giraud-HéraudE. GjerløwJ. González-NuevoK. M. GórskiS. GrattonA. GregorioA. GruppusoJ. E. GudmundssonF. K. HansenD. HansonD. L. HarrisonG. HelouS. Henrot-VersilléC. Hernández-MonteagudoD. HerranzS. R. HildebrandtE. HivonM. HobsonW. A. HolmesA. HornstrupW. HovestK. M. HuffenbergerG. HurierA. H. JaffeT. R. JaffeW. C. JonesM. JuvelaE. KeihänenR. KeskitaloJ. KimT. S. KisnerJ. KnocheM. KunzH. Kurki-SuonioG. LagacheA. LähteenmäkiJ. -M. LamarreA. LasenbyM. LattanziC. R. LawrenceJ. P. LeahyR. LeonardiJ. LesgourguesF. LevrierM. LiguoriP. B. LiljeM. Linden-VørnleM. López-CaniegoP. M. LubinJ. F. Macías-PérezG. MaggioD. MainoN. MandolesiA. MangilliM. MarisP. G. MartinE. Martínez-GonzálezS. MasiS. MatarreseP. McGeheeP. R. MeinholdA. MelchiorriL. MendesA. MennellaM. MigliaccioS. MitraM. -A. Miville-DeschênesD. MolinariA. MonetiL. MontierG. MorganteD. MortlockA. MossD. MunshiJ. A. MurphyP. NaselskyF. NatiP. NatoliC. B. NetterfieldH. U. Nørgaard-NielsenF. NovielloD. NovikovI. NovikovN. OppermannC. A. OxborrowF. PaciL. PaganoF. PajotD. PaolettiF. PasianG. PatanchonO. PerdereauL. PerottoF. PerrottaV. PettorinoF. PiacentiniM. PiatE. PierpaoliD. PietrobonS. PlaszczynskiE. PointecouteauG. PolentaL. PopaG. W. PrattG. PrézeauS. PrunetJ. -L. PugetJ. P. RachenR. ReboloM. ReineckeM. RemazeillesC. RenaultA. RenziI. RistorcelliG. RochaC. RossetM. RossettiG. RoudierJ. A. Rubiño-MartínB. Ruiz-GranadosB. RusholmeM. SandriD. SantosM. SavelainenG. SaviniD. ScottM. D. SeiffertE. P. S. ShellardM. ShiraishiL. D. SpencerV. StolyarovR. StomporR. SudiwalaR. SunyaevD. SuttonA. -S. Suur-UskiJ. -F. SygnetJ. A. TauberL. TerenziL. ToffolattiM. TomasiM. TristramM. TucciJ. TuovinenG. UmanaL. ValenzianoJ. ValiviitaB. Van TentP. VielvaF. VillaL. A. WadeB. D. WandeltI. K. WehusD. YvonA. ZaccheiA. Zonca

Abstract

We compute and investigate four types of imprint of a stochastic background of primordial magnetic fields (PMFs) on the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies: the impact of PMFs on the CMB spectra; the effect on CMB polarization induced by Faraday rotation; the impact of PMFs on the ionization history; magnetically-induced non-Gaussianities; and the magnetically-induced breaking of statistical isotropy. Overall, Planck data constrain the amplitude of PMFs to less than a few nanogauss. In particular, individual limits coming from the analysis of the CMB angular power spectra, using the Planck likelihood, are B1 Mpc<4.4B_{1\,\mathrm{Mpc}}< 4.4 nG (where B1 MpcB_{1\,\mathrm{Mpc}} is the comoving field amplitude at a scale of 1 Mpc) at 95% confidence level, assuming zero helicity, and B1 Mpc<5.6B_{1\,\mathrm{Mpc}}< 5.6 nG for a maximally helical field.For nearly scale-invariant PMFs we obtain B1 Mpc<2.0B_{1\,\mathrm{Mpc}}<2.0 nG and B1 Mpc<0.9B_{1\,\mathrm{Mpc}}<0.9 nG if the impact of PMFs on the ionization history of the Universe is included. From the analysis of magnetically-induced non-Gaussianity we obtain three different values, corresponding to three applied methods, all below 5 nG. The constraint from the magnetically-induced passive-tensor bispectrum is B1 Mpc<2.8B_{1\,\mathrm{Mpc}}< 2.8 nG. A search for preferred directions in the magnetically-induced passive bispectrum yields B1 Mpc<4.5B_{1\,\mathrm{Mpc}}< 4.5 nG, whereas the the compensated-scalar bispectrum gives B1 Mpc<3B_{1\,\mathrm{Mpc}}< 3 nG. The analysis of the Faraday rotation of CMB polarization by PMFs uses the Planck power spectra in EEEE and BBBB at 70 GHz and gives B1 Mpc<1380B_{1\,\mathrm{Mpc}}< 1380 nG. In our final analysis, we consider the harmonic-space correlations produced by Alfvén waves, finding no significant evidence for the presence of these waves. Together, these results comprise a comprehensive set of constraints on possible PMFs with Planck data.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.