Planck 2015 results. XI. CMB power spectra, likelihoods, and robustness of parameters

preprint2016arXivOpen access
Planck CollaborationN. AghanimM. ArnaudM. AshdownJ. AumontC. BaccigalupiA. J. BandayR. B. BarreiroJ. G. BartlettN. BartoloE. BattanerK. BenabedA. BenoîtA. Benoit-LévyJ. -P. BernardM. BersanelliP. BielewiczJ. J. BockA. BonaldiL. BonaveraJ. R. BondJ. BorrillF. R. BouchetF. BoulangerM. BucherC. BuriganaR. C. ButlerE. CalabreseJ. -F. CardosoA. CatalanoA. ChallinorH. C. ChiangP. R. ChristensenD. L. ClementsL. P. L. ColomboC. CombetA. CoulaisB. P. CrillA. CurtoF. CuttaiaL. DaneseR. D. DaviesR. J. DavisP. de BernardisA. De RosaG. De ZottiJ. DelabrouilleF. -X. DésertE. Di ValentinoC. DickinsonJ. M. DiegoK. DolagH. DoleS. DonzelliO. DoréM. DouspisA. DucoutJ. DunkleyX. DupacG. EfstathiouF. ElsnerT. A. EnßlinH. K. EriksenJ. FergussonF. FinelliO. ForniM. FrailisA. A. FraisseE. FranceschiA. FrejselS. GaleottaS. GalliK. GangaC. GauthierM. GerbinoM. GiardE. GjerløwJ. González-NuevoK. M. GórskiS. GrattonA. GregorioA. GruppusoJ. E. GudmundssonJ. HamannF. K. HansenD. L. HarrisonG. HelouS. Henrot-VersilléC. Hernández-MonteagudoD. HerranzS. R. HildebrandtE. HivonW. A. HolmesA. HornstrupK. M. HuffenbergerG. HurierA. H. JaffeW. C. JonesM. JuvelaE. KeihänenR. KeskitaloK. KiiveriJ. KnocheL. KnoxM. KunzH. Kurki-SuonioG. LagacheA. LähteenmäkiJ. -M. LamarreA. LasenbyM. LattanziC. R. LawrenceM. Le JeuneR. LeonardiJ. LesgourguesF. LevrierA. LewisM. LiguoriP. B. LiljeM. LilleyM. Linden-VørnleV. LindholmM. López-CaniegoJ. F. Macías-PérezB. MaffeiG. MaggioD. MainoN. MandolesiA. MangilliM. MarisP. G. MartinE. Martínez-GonzálezS. MasiS. MatarreseP. R. MeinholdA. MelchiorriM. MigliaccioM. MilleaS. MitraM. -A. Miville-DeschênesA. MonetiL. MontierG. MorganteD. MortlockS. MottetD. MunshiJ. A. MurphyA. NarimaniP. NaselskyF. NatiP. NatoliF. NovielloD. NovikovI. NovikovC. A. OxborrowF. PaciL. PaganoF. PajotD. PaolettiB. PartridgeF. PasianG. PatanchonT. J. PearsonO. PerdereauL. PerottoV. PettorinoF. PiacentiniM. PiatE. PierpaoliD. PietrobonS. PlaszczynskiE. PointecouteauG. PolentaN. PonthieuG. W. PrattS. PrunetJ. -L. PugetJ. P. RachenM. ReineckeM. RemazeillesC. RenaultA. RenziI. RistorcelliG. RochaM. RossettiG. RoudierB. Rouillé d'OrfeuilJ. A. Rubiño-MartínB. RusholmeL. SalvatiM. SandriD. SantosM. SavelainenG. SaviniD. ScottP. SerraL. D. SpencerM. SpinelliV. StolyarovR. StomporR. SunyaevD. SuttonA. -S. Suur-UskiJ. -F. SygnetJ. A. TauberL. TerenziL. ToffolattiM. TomasiM. TristramT. TrombettiM. TucciJ. TuovinenG. UmanaL. ValenzianoJ. ValiviitaF. Van TentP. VielvaF. VillaL. A. WadeB. D. WandeltI. K. WehusD. YvonA. ZaccheiA. Zonca

Abstract

This paper presents the Planck 2015 likelihoods, statistical descriptions of the 2-point correlations of CMB data, using the hybrid approach employed previously: pixel-based at ℓ<30\ell<30 and a Gaussian approximation to the distribution of spectra at higher ℓ\ell. The main improvements are the use of more and better processed data and of Planck polarization data, and more detailed foreground and instrumental models, allowing further checks and enhanced immunity to systematics. Progress in foreground modelling enables a larger sky fraction. Improvements in processing and instrumental models further reduce uncertainties. For temperature, we perform an analysis of end-to-end instrumental simulations fed into the data processing pipeline; this does not reveal biases from residual instrumental systematics. The ΛΛCDM cosmological model continues to offer a very good fit to Planck data. The slope of primordial scalar fluctuations, nsn_s, is confirmed smaller than unity at more than 5σ from Planck alone. We further validate robustness against specific extensions to the baseline cosmology. E.g., the effective number of neutrino species remains compatible with the canonical value of 3.046. This first detailed analysis of Planck polarization concentrates on E modes. At low ℓ\ell we use temperature at all frequencies and a subset of polarization. The frequency range improves CMB-foreground separation. Within the baseline model this requires a reionization optical depth τ=0.078±0.019τ=0.078\pm0.019, significantly lower than without high-frequency data for explicit dust monitoring. At high ℓ\ell we detect residual errors in E, typically O(μμK2^2); we recommend temperature alone as the high-ℓ\ell baseline. Nevertheless, Planck high-ℓ\ell polarization allows a separate determination of ΛΛCDM parameters consistent with those from temperature alone.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.