Planck 2013 results. XX. Cosmology from Sunyaev-Zeldovich cluster counts

preprint2014arXivOpen access
Planck CollaborationP. A. R. AdeN. AghanimC. Armitage-CaplanM. ArnaudM. AshdownF. Atrio-BarandelaJ. AumontC. BaccigalupiA. J. BandayR. B. BarreiroR. BarrenaJ. G. BartlettE. BattanerR. BattyeK. BenabedA. BenoîtA. Benoit-LévyJ. -P. BernardM. BersanelliP. BielewiczI. BikmaevA. BlanchardJ. BobinJ. J. BockH. BöhringerA. BonaldiJ. R. BondJ. BorrillF. R. BouchetH. BourdinM. BridgesM. L. BrownM. BucherR. BureninC. BuriganaR. C. ButlerJ. -F. CardosoP. CarvalhoA. CatalanoA. ChallinorA. ChamballuR. -R. CharyL. -Y ChiangH. C. ChiangG. ChonP. R. ChristensenS. ChurchD. L. ClementsS. ColombiL. P. L. ColomboF. CouchotA. CoulaisB. P. CrillA. CurtoF. CuttaiaA. Da SilvaH. DahleL. DaneseR. D. DaviesR. J. DavisP. de BernardisA. De RosaG. De ZottiJ. DelabrouilleJ. -M. DelouisJ. DémoclèsF. -X. DésertC. DickinsonJ. M. DiegoK. DolagH. DoleS. DonzelliO. DoréM. DouspisX. DupacG. EfstathiouT. A. EnßlinH. K. EriksenF. FinelliI. Flores-CachoO. ForniM. FrailisE. FranceschiS. FromenteauS. GaleottaK. GangaR. T. Génova-SantosM. GiardG. GiardinoY. Giraud-HéraudJ. González-NuevoK. M. GórskiS. GrattonA. GregorioA. GruppusoF. K. HansenD. HansonD. HarrisonS. Henrot-VersilléC. Hernández-MonteagudoD. HerranzS. R. HildebrandtE. HivonM. HobsonW. A. HolmesA. HornstrupW. HovestK. M. HuffenbergerG. HurierT. R. JaffeA. H. JaffeW. C. JonesM. JuvelaE. KeihänenR. KeskitaloI. KhamitovT. S. KisnerR. KneisslJ. KnocheL. KnoxM. KunzH. Kurki-SuonioG. LagacheA. LähteenmäkiJ. -M. LamarreA. LasenbyR. J. LaureijsC. R. LawrenceJ. P. LeahyR. LeonardiJ. León-TavaresJ. LesgourguesA. LiddleM. LiguoriP. B. LiljeM. Linden-VørnleM. López-CaniegoP. M. LubinJ. F. Macías-PérezB. MaffeiD. MainoN. MandolesiA. Marcos-CaballeroM. MarisD. J. MarshallP. G. MartinE. Martínez-GonzálezS. MasiS. MatarreseF. MatthaiP. MazzottaP. R. MeinholdA. MelchiorriJ. -B. MelinL. MendesA. MennellaM. MigliaccioS. MitraM. -A. Miville-DeschênesA. MonetiL. MontierG. MorganteD. MortlockA. MossD. MunshiP. NaselskyF. NatiP. NatoliC. B. NetterfieldH. U. Nørgaard-NielsenF. NovielloD. NovikovI. NovikovS. OsborneC. A. OxborrowF. PaciL. PaganoF. PajotD. PaolettiB. PartridgeF. PasianG. PatanchonO. PerdereauL. PerottoF. PerrottaF. PiacentiniM. PiatE. PierpaoliD. PietrobonS. PlaszczynskiE. PointecouteauG. PolentaN. PonthieuL. PopaT. PoutanenG. W. PrattG. PrézeauS. PrunetJ. -L. PugetJ. P. RachenR. ReboloM. ReineckeM. RemazeillesC. RenaultS. RicciardiT. RillerI. RistorcelliG. RochaM. RomanC. RossetG. RoudierM. Rowan-RobinsonJ. A. Rubiño-MartínB. RusholmeM. SandriD. SantosG. SaviniD. ScottM. D. SeiffertE. P. S. ShellardL. D. SpencerJ. -L. StarckV. StolyarovR. StomporR. SudiwalaR. SunyaevF. SureauD. SuttonA. -S. Suur-UskiJ. -F. SygnetJ. A. TauberD. TavagnaccoL. TerenziL. ToffolattiM. TomasiM. TristramM. TucciJ. TuovinenM. TürlerG. UmanaL. ValenzianoJ. ValiviitaB. Van TentP. VielvaF. VillaN. VittorioL. A. WadeB. D. WandeltJ. WellerM. WhiteS. D. M. WhiteD. YvonA. ZaccheiA. Zonca

Abstract

We present constraints on cosmological parameters using number counts as a function of redshift for a sub-sample of 189 galaxy clusters from the Planck SZ (PSZ) catalogue. The PSZ is selected through the signature of the Sunyaev--Zeldovich (SZ) effect, and the sub-sample used here has a signal-to-noise threshold of seven, with each object confirmed as a cluster and all but one with a redshift estimate. We discuss the completeness of the sample and our construction of a likelihood analysis. Using a relation between mass MM and SZ signal YY calibrated to X-ray measurements, we derive constraints on the power spectrum amplitude σ8σ_8 and matter density parameter ΩmΩ_{\mathrm{m}} in a flat ΛΛCDM model. We test the robustness of our estimates and find that possible biases in the YY--MM relation and the halo mass function are larger than the statistical uncertainties from the cluster sample. Assuming the X-ray determined mass to be biased low relative to the true mass by between zero and 30%, motivated by comparison of the observed mass scaling relations to those from a set of numerical simulations, we find that σ8=0.75±0.03σ_8=0.75\pm 0.03, Ωm=0.29±0.02Ω_{\mathrm{m}}=0.29\pm 0.02, and σ8(Ωm/0.27)0.3=0.764±0.025σ_8(Ω_{\mathrm{m}}/0.27)^{0.3} = 0.764 \pm 0.025. The value of σ8σ_8 is degenerate with the mass bias; if the latter is fixed to a value of 20% we find σ8(Ωm/0.27)0.3=0.78±0.01σ_8(Ω_{\mathrm{m}}/0.27)^{0.3}=0.78\pm 0.01 and a tighter one-dimensional range σ8=0.77±0.02σ_8=0.77\pm 0.02. We find that the larger values of σ8σ_8 and ΩmΩ_{\mathrm{m}} preferred by Planck's measurements of the primary CMB anisotropies can be accommodated by a mass bias of about 40%. Alternatively, consistency with the primary CMB constraints can be achieved by inclusion of processes that suppress power on small scales relative to the ΛΛCDM model, such as a component of massive neutrinos (abridged).

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.