Paper detail

Planar Visibility: Testing and Counting

In this paper we consider query versions of visibility testing and visibility counting. Let $S$ be a set of $n$ disjoint line segments in $\R^2$ and let $s$ be an element of $S$. Visibility testing is to preprocess $S$ so that we can quickly determine if $s$ is visible from a query point $q$. Visibility counting involves preprocessing $S$ so that one can quickly estimate the number of segments in $S$ visible from a query point $q$. We present several data structures for the two query problems. The structures build upon a result by O'Rourke and Suri (1984) who showed that the subset, $V_S(s)$, of $\R^2$ that is weakly visible from a segment $s$ can be represented as the union of a set, $C_S(s)$, of $O(n^2)$ triangles, even though the complexity of $V_S(s)$ can be $Ω(n^4)$. We define a variant of their covering, give efficient output-sensitive algorithms for computing it, and prove additional properties needed to obtain approximation bounds. Some of our bounds rely on a new combinatorial result that relates the number of segments of $S$ visible from a point $p$ to the number of triangles in $\bigcup_{s\in S} C_S(s)$ that contain $p$.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.