Paper detail

PIR with Low Storage Overhead: Coding instead of Replication

Private information retrieval (PIR) protocols allow a user to retrieve a data item from a database without revealing any information about the identity of the item being retrieved. Specifically, in information-theoretic $k$-server PIR, the database is replicated among $k$ non-communicating servers, and each server learns nothing about the item retrieved by the user. The cost of PIR protocols is usually measured in terms of their communication complexity, which is the total number of bits exchanged between the user and the servers, and storage overhead, which is the ratio between the total number of bits stored on all the servers and the number of bits in the database. Since single-server information-theoretic PIR is impossible, the storage overhead of all existing PIR protocols is at least $2$. In this work, we show that information-theoretic PIR can be achieved with storage overhead arbitrarily close to the optimal value of $1$, without sacrificing the communication complexity. Specifically, we prove that all known $k$-server PIR protocols can be efficiently emulated, while preserving both privacy and communication complexity but significantly reducing the storage overhead. To this end, we distribute the $n$ bits of the database among $s+r$ servers, each storing $n/s$ coded bits (rather than replicas). For every fixed $k$, the resulting storage overhead $(s+r)/s$ approaches $1$ as $s$ grows; explicitly we have $r\le k\sqrt{s}(1+o(1))$. Moreover, in the special case $k = 2$, the storage overhead is only $1 + \frac{1}{s}$. In order to achieve these results, we introduce and study a new kind of binary linear codes, called here $k$-server PIR codes. We then show how such codes can be constructed, and we establish several bounds on the parameters of $k$-server PIR codes. Finally, we briefly discuss extensions of our results to nonbinary alphabets, to robust PIR, and to $t$-private PIR.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.