Paper detail

Pierce stalks in preprimal varieties

An algebra $\mathbf{P}$ is called \textit{preprimal} if $\mathbf{P}$ is finite and $\func{Clo}(\mathbf{P})$ is a maximal clone. A \textit{preprimal variety} is a variety generated by a preprimal algebra. After Rosenberg's classification of maximal clones \cite{ro}; we have that a finite algebra is preprimal if and only if its term operations are exactly the functions preserving a relation of one of the following seven types: 1. Permutations with cycles all the same prime length, 2. Proper subsets, 3 Prime-affine relations, 4. Bounded partial orders, 5. $h$-adic relations, 6. Central relations $h\geq 2$, 7. Proper, non-trivial equivalence relations. In \cite{kn} Knoebel studies the Pierce sheaf of the different preprimal varieties and he asks for a description of the Pierce stalks. He solves this problem for the cases 1.,2. and 3. and left open the remaining cases. In this paper, using central element theory we succeeded in describing the Pierce stalks of the cases 6. and 7..

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.