Paper detail

PIEMAP: Personalized Inverse Eikonal Model from cardiac Electro-Anatomical Maps

Electroanatomical mapping, a keystone diagnostic tool in cardiac electrophysiology studies, can provide high-density maps of the local electric properties of the tissue. It is therefore tempting to use such data to better individualize current patient-specific models of the heart through a data assimilation procedure and to extract potentially insightful information such as conduction properties. Parameter identification for state-of-the-art cardiac models is however a challenging task. In this work, we introduce a novel inverse problem for inferring the anisotropic structure of the conductivity tensor, that is fiber orientation and conduction velocity along and across fibers, of an eikonal model for cardiac activation. The proposed method, named PIEMAP, performed robustly with synthetic data and showed promising results with clinical data. These results suggest that PIEMAP could be a useful supplement in future clinical workflows of personalized therapies.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.