Paper detail

Piecewise smooth systems near a co-dimension 2 discontinuity manifold: can one say what should happen?

We consider a piecewise smooth system in the neighborhood of a co-dimension 2 discontinuity manifold $Σ$. Within the class of Filippov solutions, if $Σ$ is attractive, one should expect solution trajectories to slide on $Σ$. It is well known, however, that the classical Filippov convexification methodology is ambiguous on $Σ$. The situation is further complicated by the possibility that, regardless of how sliding on $Σ$ is taking place, during sliding motion a trajectory encounters so-called generic first order exit points, where $Σ$ ceases to be attractive. In this work, we attempt to understand what behavior one should expect of a solution trajectory near $Σ$ when $Σ$ is attractive, what to expect when $Σ$ ceases to be attractive (at least, at generic exit points), and finally we also contrast and compare the behavior of some regularizations proposed in the literature. Through analysis and experiments we will confirm some known facts, and provide some important insight: (i) when $Σ$ is attractive, a solution trajectory indeed does remain near $Σ$, viz. sliding on $Σ$ is an appropriate idealization (of course, in general, one cannot predict which sliding vector field should be selected); (ii) when $Σ$ loses attractivity (at first order exit conditions), a typical solution trajectory leaves a neighborhood of $Σ$; (iii) there is no obvious way to regularize the system so that the regularized trajectory will remain near $Σ$ as long as $Σ$ is attractive, and so that it will be leaving (a neighborhood of) $Σ$ when $Σ$ looses attractivity. We reach the above conclusions by considering exclusively the given piecewise smooth system, without superimposing any assumption on what kind of dynamics near $Σ$ (or sliding motion on $Σ$) should have been taking place.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.