Paper detail

PIDNet: Progressive Implicit Decouple Network for Multimodal Action Quality Assessment

Action quality assessment (AQA) aims to automatically quantify the execution quality of human actions in videos and is valuable for applications such as competitive sports judging. In multimodal AQA, quality evidence from different modalities is heterogeneous, and quality cues evolve progressively over time. Existing methods often rely on coarse fusion or unified temporal modeling, which may blur modality-specific cues, preserve cross-modal redundancy, and weaken stage-specific quality evidence. To address these issues, we propose a progressive implicit decoupling and fusion network (PIDNet) that progressively integrates modality-specific information, cross-modal complementary cues, and global quality semantics for accurate assessment. Specifically, we design an iMambaWave module that maps RGB, optical flow, and audio features into a shared latent space and disentangles them with a Bi-Mamba branch and a wavelet-transform branch to capture long-range temporal dependencies and local perturbation details, respectively. A gated aggregation mechanism adaptively fuses temporal and frequency-domain information. We further build a three-stage progressive fusion network using Group3M blocks, where modality complementary attention retrieves cross-modal evidence while suppressing redundancy, and multi-scale convolutions enrich feature representations. Experiments on the Rhythmic Gymnastics and Fis-V datasets show that PIDNet achieves highly competitive score correlation with favorable error control compared with existing unimodal and multimodal methods. Ablation studies verify the effectiveness of each component. Moreover, iMambaWave consistently improves visual representation and temporal modeling across multiple backbones, showing good generalization and plug-and-play capability.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.