Paper detail

Picky Partners: The Pairing of Component Masses in Binary Black Hole Mergers

We examine the relationship between individual black hole (BH) masses in merging binary black hole (BBH) systems. Analyzing the ten BBH detections from LIGO/Virgo's first two observing runs, we find that the masses of the component BHs comprising each binary are unlikely to be randomly drawn from the same underlying distribution. Instead, the two BHs of a given binary prefer to be of comparable mass. We show that it is $\sim 5$ times more likely that the component BHs in a given binary are always equal (to within 5\%) than that they are randomly paired. If we assume that the probability of a merger between two BHs scales with the mass ratio $q$ as $q^β$, so that $β=0$ corresponds to random pairings, we find $β>0$ is favored at credibility 0.987. By modeling the mass distribution, we find that the median mass ratio is $q_{50\%} = 0.91^{+0.05}_{-0.17}$ at 90\% credibility. While the pairing between BHs depends on their mass ratio, we find no evidence that it depends on the total mass of the system: it is $\sim 6$ times more likely that the pairing depends purely on the mass ratio than on the total mass. We predict that 99\% of BBHs detected by LIGO/Virgo will have mass ratios $q > 0.5$. We conclude that merging black holes do not form random pairings; instead they are selective about their partners, preferring to mate with black holes of a similar mass. The details of these selective pairings provide insight into the underlying formation channels of merging binaries.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.