Paper detail

Physics of nova outbursts: A theoretical model of classical nova outbursts with self-consistent wind mass loss

We present a model for one cycle of a classical nova outburst based on a self-consistent wind mass loss accelerated by the gradient of radiation pressure, i.e., the so-called optically thick winds. Evolution models are calculated by a Henyey code for a 1.0 $M_\odot$ white dwarf (WD) with a mass accretion rate of $5 \times 10^{-9}~M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$. The outermost part of hydrogen-rich envelope is connected to a steadily moving envelope when optically thick winds occur. We confirm that no internal shock waves occur at the thermonuclear runaway. The wind mass loss rate reaches a peak of $1.4 \times 10^{-4}~M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$ at the epoch of the maximum photospheric expansion, where the photospheric temperature decreases to $\log T_{\rm ph}$ (K)=3.90. Almost all of the accreted mass is lost in the wind. The nuclear energy generated in hydrogen burning is lost in a form of photon emission (64 %), gravitational energy (lifting-up the wind matter against the gravity, 35 %), and kinetic energy of the wind (0.23 %). A classical nova should be very bright in a far-UV (100 - 300 Å) band, during a day just after the onset of thermonuclear runaway ($\sim$25 d before the optical maximum). In the decay phase of the nova outburst, the envelope structure is very close to that of a steady state solution.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.