Paper detail

Physics of Non-Universal Larson's Relation

From a new perspective, we re-examine self-gravity and turbulence jointly, in hopes of understanding the physical basis for one of the most important empirical relations governing clouds in the interstellar medium (ISM), the Larson's Relation relating velocity dispersion ($σ_R$) to cloud size ($R$). We report on two key new findings. First, the correct form of the Larson's Relation is $σ_R=α_v^{1/5}σ_{pc}(R/1pc)^{3/5}$, where $α_v$ is the virial parameter of clouds and $σ_{pc}$ is the strength of the turbulence, if the turbulence has the Kolmogorov spectrum. Second, the amplitude of the Larson's Relation, $σ_{pc}$, is not universal, differing by a factor of about two between clouds on the Galactic disk and those at the Galactic center, evidenced by observational data.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.