Paper detail

Physically viable solutions of anisotropic spheres in $f(\mathscr{R},\mathscr{G})$ gravity satisfying the Karmarkar condition

This paper is devoted to discuss compact stars in $f(\mathscr{R},\mathscr{G})$ gravity, where $\mathscr{R}$ and $\mathscr{G}$ denote the Ricci scalar and Gauss-Bonnet invariant respectively. To meet this aim, we consider spherically symmetric space-time with anisotropic fluid distribution. In particular, the Karmarkar condition is used to explore the compact star solutions. Further, we choose two specific model of compact stars namely LMC X-4 (mass =1.29$M/M_{\odot}$ \& radii=9.711 km) and EXO 1785-248 (mass =1.30$M/M_{\odot}$ \& radii=8.849 km). We develop the field equations for $f(\mathscr{R},\mathscr{G})$ gravity by employing the Karmarkar condition with a specific model already reported in literature by Lake [Phys. Rev. D 67, 104015 (2003)]. We further consider the Schwarzschild geometry for matching conditions at the boundary. It is important to mention here that we calculate the values of all the involved parameter by imposing the matching condition. We have provided a detailed graphical analysis to discuss the physical acceptability of parameters, i.e., energy density, pressure, anisotropy, and gradients. We have also examined the stability of compacts stars by exploring the energy conditions, equation of state, generalized Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equation, causality condition, and adiabatic index. For present analysis, we predict some numerical values in tabular form for central gravitational metric functions, central density and central pressures components. We have also calculated the ratio $p_{rc}/ ρ_{c}$ to check the validity of Zeldovich's condition. Conclusively, it is found that our obtained solutions are physically viable with well-behaved nature in $f(\mathscr{R},\mathscr{G})$ modified gravity for the compact star models under discussion.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.