Paper detail

Physically Plausible Spectral Reconstruction from RGB Images

Recently Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) have been used to reconstruct hyperspectral information from RGB images. Moreover, this spectral reconstruction problem (SR) can often be solved with good (low) error. However, these methods are not physically plausible: that is when the recovered spectra are reintegrated with the underlying camera sensitivities, the resulting predicted RGB is not the same as the actual RGB, and sometimes this discrepancy can be large. The problem is further compounded by exposure change. Indeed, most learning-based SR models train for a fixed exposure setting and we show that this can result in poor performance when exposure varies. In this paper we show how CNN learning can be extended so that physical plausibility is enforced and the problem resulting from changing exposures is mitigated. Our SR solution improves the state-of-the-art spectral recovery performance under varying exposure conditions while simultaneously ensuring physical plausibility (the recovered spectra reintegrate to the input RGBs exactly).

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.