Paper detail

Physical properties of Taurid meteoroids of various sizes

The origin of the Taurid complex is still debated. In addition to comet 2P/Encke, various asteroids were proposed to be members of the complex and thus possible parent bodies of Taurid meteoroids. Studies of physical properties of Taurid meteoroids can provide constrains on their source. We used a well defined orbital sample of 16 Taurid fireballs with detailed radiometric light curves. The sample represented meteoroids of initial masses from 8 grams to 650 kg (diameters 1 - 70 cm). The semi-empirical fragmentation model was used to study their atmospheric fragmentation and derive strength distribution within the meteoroids. It was found that small meteoroids are stronger than large ones. When considering Taurid material as a whole, the majority has a very low strength of less than 0.01 MPa and a density less than 1000 kg/m3. The low strength material exists mostly as large bodies (>10 cm). If encountered in smaller bodies, it forms only a minor part. Stronger materials up to 0.3 MPa exist in Taurids as well, but the stronger material the rarer it is. Strong material forms small inclusions in large bodies or exists as small (cm-sized) separate bodies. These properties strongly suggest cometary origin of Taurids.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.