Paper detail

Physical Properties of Spectroscopically-Confirmed Galaxies at $z\ge6$. III. Stellar Populations from SED Modeling with Secure Ly$α$ Emission and Redshifts

We present a study of stellar populations in a sample of spectroscopically-confirmed Lyman-break galaxies (LBGs) and Ly$α$ emitters (LAEs) at $5.7<z<7$. These galaxies have deep optical and infrared images from Subaru, $HST$, and $Spitzer$/IRAC. We focus on a subset of 27 galaxies with IRAC detections, and characterize their stellar populations utilizing galaxy synthesis models based on the multi-band data and secure redshifts. By incorporating nebular emission estimated from the observed Ly$α$ flux, we are able to break the strong degeneracy of model spectra between young galaxies with prominent nebular emission and older galaxies with strong Balmer breaks. The results show that our galaxies cover a wide range of ages from several to a few hundred million years (Myr), and a wide range of stellar masses from $\sim10^8$ to $\sim10^{11}$ $M_{\odot}$. These galaxies can be roughly divided into an `old' subsample and a `young' subsample. The `old' subsample consists of galaxies older than 100 Myr, with stellar masses higher than $10^9$ $M_{\odot}$. The galaxies in the `young' subsample are younger than $\sim$30 Myr, with masses ranging between $\sim10^8$ and $\sim3\times10^9$ $M_{\odot}$. Both subsamples display a correlation between stellar mass and star-formation rate (SFR), but with very different normalizations. The average specific SFR (sSFR) of the `old' subsample is 3--4 Gyr$^{-1}$, consistent with previous studies of `normal' star-forming galaxies at $z\ge6$. The average sSFR of the `young' subsample is an order of magnitude higher, likely due to starburst activity. Our results also indicate little or no dust extinction in the majority of the galaxies, as already suggested by their steep rest-frame UV slopes. Finally, LAEs and LBGs with strong Ly$α$ emission are indistinguishable in terms of age, stellar mass, and SFR.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access12 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.