Paper detail

Physical properties of CO-dark molecular gas traced by C$^+$

Neither HI nor CO emission can reveal a significant quantity of so-called dark gas in the interstellar medium (ISM). It is considered that CO-dark molecular gas (DMG), the molecular gas with no or weak CO emission, dominates dark gas. We identified 36 DMG clouds with C$^+$ emission (data from Galactic Observations of Terahertz C+ (GOT C+) project) and HINSA features. Based on uncertainty analysis, optical depth of HI $τ\rm_{HI}$ of 1 is a reasonable value for most clouds. With the assumption of $τ\rm_{HI}=1$, these clouds were characterized by excitation temperatures in a range of 20 K to 92 K with a median value of 55 K and volume densities in the range of $6.2\times10^1$ cm$^{-3}$ to $1.2\times 10^3$ cm$^{-3}$ with a median value of $2.3\times 10^2$ cm$^{-3}$. The fraction of DMG column density in the cloud ($f\rm_{DMG}$) decreases with increasing excitation temperature following an empirical relation $f\rm_{DMG}=-2.1\times 10^{-3}T_(ex,τ_{HI}=1)$+1.0. The relation between $f\rm_{DMG}$ and total hydrogen column density $N_H$ is given by $f\rm_{DMG}$=$1.0-3.7\times 10^{20}/N_H$. The values of $f\rm_{DMG}$ in the clouds of low extinction group ($A\rm_V \le 2.7$ mag) are consistent with the results of the time-dependent, chemical evolutionary model at the age of ~ 10 Myr. Our empirical relation cannot be explained by the chemical evolutionary model for clouds in the high extinction group ($A\rm_V > 2.7$ mag). Compared to clouds in the low extinction group ($A\rm_V \le 2.7$ mag), clouds in the high extinction group ($A\rm_V > 2.7$ mag) have comparable volume densities but excitation temperatures that are 1.5 times lower. Moreover, CO abundances in clouds of the high extinction group ($A\rm_V > 2.7$ mag) are $6.6\times 10^2$ times smaller than the canonical value in the Milky Way. #[Full version of abstract is shown in the text.]#

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.