Paper detail

Physical Observations of (196256) 2003 EH$_{1}$, Presumed Parent of the Quadrantid Meteoroid Stream

The near-Earth asteroid (196256) 2003 EH1 has been suggested to have a dynamical association with the Quadrantid meteoroid stream. We present photometric observations taken to investigate the physical character of this body and to explore its possible relation to the stream. We find no evidence for on-going mass-loss. A model fitted to the point-like surface brightness profile at 2.1 AU limits the fractional contribution to the integrated brightness by near-nucleus coma to $\leq$ 2.5 %. Assuming an albedo equal to those typical of cometary nuclei ($\it p_{\rm R}$=0.04), we find that the effective nucleus radius is $r_e$ = 2.0$\pm$0.2 km. Time-resolved ${\it R}$-band photometry can be fitted by a two-peaked lightcurve having a rotational period of 12.650$\pm$0.033 hr. The range of the lightcurve, $Δm_{\rm R}$= 0.44 $\pm$ 0 .01 mag, is indicative of an elongated shape having an axis ratio $\sim$1.5 projected into the plane of the sky. The asteroid shows colors slightly redder than the Sun, being comparable with those of C-type asteroids. The limit to the mass loss rate set by the absence of resolved coma is $\lesssim$ 2.5$\times$ 10$^{-2}$ kg ${\rm s^{-1}}$, corresponding to an upper limit on the fraction of the surface that could be sublimating water ice $f_A$ $\lesssim$ 10$^{-4}$. Even if sustained over the 200-500 yr dynamical age of the Quadrantid stream, the total mass loss from 2003 EH1 would be too small to supply the reported stream mass ($10^{13}$ kg), implying either that the stream has another parent or that mass loss from 2003 EH1 is episodic.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.