Paper detail

Physical Layer Network Coding for the Multiple Access Relay Channel

We consider the two user wireless Multiple Access Relay Channel (MARC), in which nodes $A$ and $B$ want to transmit messages to a destination node $D$ with the help of a relay node $R$. For the MARC, Wang and Giannakis proposed a Complex Field Network Coding (CFNC) scheme. As an alternative, we propose a scheme based on Physical layer Network Coding (PNC), which has so far been studied widely only in the context of two-way relaying. For the proposed PNC scheme, transmission takes place in two phases: (i) Phase 1 during which $A$ and $B$ simultaneously transmit and, $R$ and $D$ receive, (ii) Phase 2 during which $A$, $B$ and $R$ simultaneously transmit to $D$. At the end of Phase 1, $R$ decodes the messages $x_A$ of $A$ and $x_B$ of $B,$ and during Phase 2 transmits $f(x_A,x_B),$ where $f$ is many-to-one. Communication protocols in which the relay node decodes are prone to loss of diversity order, due to error propagation from the relay node. To counter this, we propose a novel decoder which takes into account the possibility of an error event at $R$, without having any knowledge about the links from $A$ to $R$ and $B$ to $R$. It is shown that if certain parameters are chosen properly and if the map $f$ satisfies a condition called exclusive law, the proposed decoder offers the maximum diversity order of two. Also, it is shown that for a proper choice of the parameters, the proposed decoder admits fast decoding, with the same decoding complexity order as that of the CFNC scheme. Simulation results indicate that the proposed PNC scheme performs better than the CFNC scheme.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.