Paper detail

Physical constraints for the Stoneham model for light-dependent magnetoreception

A new biophysical model for magnetoreception in migratory birds has recently been proposed by Stoneham et al. In this photo-induced radical pair (RP) model the signal transduction mechanism was physical rather than chemical in nature, as otherwise generally assumed in the literature. The proposal contains a magnetosensor and a signal transduction mechanism. The sensor would be an electric dipole related to a long lived triplet state of an RP. This makes it sensitive to the geomagnetic field via the Zeeman interaction. The field of the electric dipole moment would then promote isomerization from cis-to-trans in the retinal of a nearby rhodopsin. This would trigger the neuronal signal. Here we gather several observations from different works that constrain the feasibility of this physical model. In particular we argue that the perturbation of rhodopsin by a local electric field from a nearby electric dipole (10^6 V/m) cannot modify the field in the binding pocket of rhodopsin (10^9 V/m) sufficiently to trigger the isomerization of cis-retinal. The dipole field is much weaker than those from other sources in the vicinity which are known not to promote isomerization.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.