Paper detail

Physical Conditions in the Broad Line Region of $z\sim3$ Quasars: A Photoionization Method to Derive $r_{BLR}$

We present high S/N UV spectra for eight quasars at $z\sim3$\ obtained with VLT/FORS. The spectra enable us to analyze in detail the strongest emission features in the rest-frame range 1400-2000 Å of each source (\ciii, \siiii, \aliii, \siii, \civ\ and \siiv). Previous work indicates that a component of these lines is emitted in a region with well-defined properties i.e., a high density and low ionization emitting region). Flux ratios \aliii/\siiii, \civ/\aliii, \siiv/\siiii, \civ/\siiv\ and \siii/\siiii\ for this region permit us to strongly constrain electron density, ionization parameter and metallicity through the use of diagnostic maps built from {\sc CLOUDY} simulations. Reliable estimates of the product density times ionization parameter allow us to derive the radius of the broad line region \rb\ from the definition of the ionization parameter. The \rb\ estimate and the assumption of virialized motions in the line emitting gas yields an estimate for black hole mass. We compare our results with estimates obtained from the \rb\ -- luminosity correlation customarily employed to estimate black hole masses of high redshift quasars.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.