Paper detail

Physical conditions and redshift evolution of optically thin C III absorbers: Low-z sample

We present a detailed analysis of 99 optically thin C III absorption systems at redshift, $0.2 \le z \le 0.9$ associated with neutral hydrogen column densities in the range, $15 \le {\rm log}$ $N_{\rm H\,I}$ ($cm^{-2}$) $\le 16.2$. Using photoionization models, we infer the number density ($n_{\rm H}$), C-abundance ($[C/H]$) and line-of-sight thickness ($L$) of these systems in the ranges, $-3.4 \le$ log $n_{\rm H}$ (in $cm^{-3}$) $\le -1.6$, $-1.6 \le [C/H] \le 0.4$, and 1.3 pc $\le L \le$ 10 kpc, respectively with most of the systems having sub-kpc scale thickness. We combine the low$-z$ and previously reported high$-z$ ($2.1\le z\le 3.3$) optically thin C III systems to study the redshift evolution and various correlation between the derived physical parameters. We see a significant redshift evolution in $n_{\rm H}$, $[C/H]$ and $L$. We compare the redshift evolution of metallicity in C III systems with those of various types of absorption systems. We find that the slope of $[C/H]$ vs. $z$ for C III absorbers is stepper compared to the redshift evolution of cosmic metallicity of the damped \lya\ sample (DLAs) but consistent with that of sub$-$DLAs. We find the existence of strong anti-correlation between $L$ vs. $[C/H]$ for the combined sample with a significance level of 8.39$σ$. We see evidence of two distinct $[C/H]$ branch C III populations (low$-[C/H]$ branch, $[C/H]$ $\le -1.2$ and high$-[C/H]$ branch, $[C/H]$ $> -1.2$) in the combined C III sample when divided appropriately in the $L$ vs. $N_{\rm C\,III}$ plane. Further studies of C III absorbers in the redshift range, $1.0 \le z \le 2.0$ is important to map the redshift evolution of these absorbers and gain insights into the time evolution physical conditions of the circumgalactic medium.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.