Paper detail

Physical conditions and element abundances in galaxies at redshift 0.001<z<3.4 : evolution trends

We have collected an heterogeneous sample of galaxies at redshifts 0.001<z<3.35 with the aim of exploring the evolution of the physical parameters and of the element abundances calculated by modelling the observed spectra. The evolution picture which results from our calculations shows that: 1) the emitting gaseous clouds in both active galactic nuclei (AGN) and starburst (SB) galaxies have a density broad peak at z=0.5 becoming less dense and more elongated with time. 2) The Ha flux emitted from the AGN clouds has a maximum at z= 0.1. 3) The observed star temperatures in SBs increase with time, indicating younger stars in local galaxies. 4) The O/H relative abundances show splitting between solar and 0.1 solar at 0.3<z<3. N/H also shows splitting in this z range but it also has a broad flat maximum between z=0.1 and z=0.001. 5) The AGN narrow line region and the regions surrounding the SB show fragmentation at z >0.35. 6) Metallicity (in terms of O/H) correlates with Ha luminosity (La) and therefore with the star formation rate with different trends regarding SBs and AGNs for La > 10^{41} erg s^{-1}. A rough correlation is seen also for N/H. There seems to be no correlation for low luminosity galaxies.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.